Download

Disease/health condition - Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection
IgM antibodies to hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV IgM)
Assay format
Immunoassay
Information History
First added in 2022
Purpose type
Diagnosis
Purpose
To diagnose acute hepatitis E virus infection.
Specimen types
Serum, Plasma
GMDN

48411

Hepatitis E virus immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody IVD, kit, enzyme immunoassay (EIA)

A collection of reagents and other associated materials intended to be used for the qualitative and/or quantitative detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to the Hepatitis E virus in a clinical specimen, using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method.

The medical device term(s), code(s) and definition(s) in this section were retrieved from databases external to WHO. As there might be more than one name, definition and “Nomenclature Code” related to the specific medical device, please consult https://gmdnagency.org GMDN ®. © GMDN Agency 2005-2024
EMDN

W0105020505

HEV ANTIBODY IGM

The code(s) and term(s) in this section were observed and retrieved from public databases and have not been validated by health regulatory authorities. Please consult your regulatory agency and EMDN site: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/dyna2/emdn
WHO supporting publications
World Health Organization. (‎2014)‎. Waterbone outbreaks of hepatitis E: recognition, investigation and control: technical report. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/129448
Technical specifications
N/A
SAGE IVD recommended including the hepatitis E virus IgM ELISA antibody test category in EDL 4
• as a disease-specific IVD for use in clinical laboratories (EDL 4, Section II.b);
• using an immunoassay format;
• using serum and plasma as specimen types;
• to diagnose acute hepatitis E virus infection.
Hepatitis E is an acute viral hepatitis caused by HEV infection. Most affected people recover. However, a small proportion – generally less than 5% but much higher in pregnant women – develop acute liver failure. Hepatitis E should always be considered in outbreaks of acute jaundice syndrome, which have occurred more recently across sub-Saharan Africa, and particularly in the context of internally displaced person camps. Definitive diagnosis of hepatitis E is challenging, as causes of acute jaundice are many and include yellow fever, hepatitis A and leptospirosis. For countries experiencing outbreaks, the problem of differential diagnosis is exacerbated by lack of access to hepatitis E assays. The HEV IgM ELISA is one of three hepatitis E assays submitted as new additions to EDL 4. ELISA is well established in many laboratories and settings. SAGE IVD members questioned whether all three assays are needed and noted uncertainties about how best to use the laboratory-based and RDT tests for diagnosing HEV infection. One SAGE IVD member noted that RDT and NAT and ELISA are all essential for a laboratory network and how individual countries choose to implement the tests will be decided on the ground. Moreover, WHO is currently updating its guidance, which includes generating a consolidated algorithm for HEV assays. One SAGE IVD member also raised a concern that the evidence submitted is at higher risk of bias owing to the nature of the populations studied. However, it was pointed out that better studies are unlikely to be done in the near future. Literature cited in the discussion: European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on hepatitis E virus infection. J Hepatol. 2018;68:1256–71 (https://www.journal- of-hepatology.eu/article/S0168-8278(18)30155-7/fulltext, accessed 14 December 2022).
Hepatitis E infection is a significant global health problem. IgM EIAs for diagnosing HEV infection are included in the WHO guidance (11, 15). The 2018 EASL guidelines also recommend a combination of anti-HEV-IgM and nucleic acid testing for HEV infection (10.1186/S12884-020-03116-2). Evidence to assess clinical utility/effectiveness is insufficient. The diagnostic accuracy estimates presented for this application are probably too optimistic, as case–control designs were used in the studies. If diagnostic accuracy were suboptimal, the value of the test would depend on how it would be used in conjunction with other tests in the diagnostic pathway. More studies are needed that evaluate the test in the intended use population. In the absence of such evidence, other factors may weigh more heavily in eventually deciding to use this test, such as resources required, acceptability and equity.
World Health Organization. (‎2023)‎. The selection and use of essential in vitro diagnostics: report of the fourth meeting of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on In Vitro Diagnostics, 2022 (‎including the fourth WHO model list of essential in vitro diagnostics)‎. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/373322